On January 1st, 2026, the existing U.S. lifetime gift tax exemption will drop from U.S. $12.92 million to U.S. $5.49 million. But there is solution-oriented good news. You can still take advantage of the two-year window of time before the rule goes into effect. In addition, there is another exemption that lets you gift up to U.S. $17,000 a year to an individual − without triggering any gift tax − whether you are a U.S. or Canadian taxpayer. You can do this annually, so it can be incorporated into your long-term financial planning as a proactive strategy. In some cases there may be tax reporting requirements or other important considerations, and you have to be careful not to exceed the tax-free cap on financial gifts. But helpful answers and useful strategies for various scenarios are covered in this informative article, “How Cross-Border Clients Can Utilize the U.S. Gift Tax Lifetime Exemption before Rules Change.” The article can be viewed below.
Articles
A Comprehensive Guide to Understanding Property Ownership in U.S. Estate Planning
Estate planning is a critical aspect of securing your financial legacy, and among its various components, property ownership stands out as a foundational yet often overlooked consideration. Properly aligning asset ownership with your estate plan can make or break your intended objectives. It’s not enough to have a well-crafted estate plan; the way you own your assets and how they are transferred both play a vital role in the successful execution of your wishes. In this guide, we’ll delve into various types of ownership and their implications in estate planning, while considering income tax, gift tax, and estate tax considerations.
Summary and Takeaways
The crucial role that property ownership plays in U.S. estate planning is often misunderstood and overlooked – and the type of ownership can significantly affect such things as state and federal taxation, claims from creditors, and whether the property is subject to probate. But there are ways to leverage particular types of ownership, as well as strategic transfers of property to others, in order to minimize future tax liability. The appropriate proactive approaches to estate planning can also help ensure the optimum value for loved ones who are your designated beneficiaries.
Key Takeaways
- Solely-owned property can be gifted to others during your lifetime, but upon your death the gifts are subject to probate, creditor claims, and taxes.
- With joint tenancy with the right of survivorship, ownership passes to the surviving joint tenant, bypassing probate, but may be subject to creditor claims.
- Spouses may use tenancy by the entirety to ensure protection from creditors and that the property passes to the surviving spouse.
- There are many estate planning options, each with potential pros and cons. It is highly recommended that a qualified estate planner familiar with all the options be consulted to ensure proper planning and desired outcomes.
Overview: The Significance of Asset Ownership
Asset ownership is the cornerstone of estate planning, influencing how property is transferred and the coordination of your estate planning endeavors. It’s crucial for financial planners to comprehend the intricacies of property ownership and its connection to asset transfer. The form of ownership determines how property can be transferred at death and what limitations may apply. Effective estate planning requires harmonizing both asset titling and property transfer strategies.
A financial planner’s understanding of income tax, gift tax, and estate tax implications is critical. Leveraging suitable asset ownership techniques alongside prudent income, gift, and estate tax strategies creates an efficient estate plan aligned with your unique estate objectives.
Sole Ownership: A Simple Approach
Sole ownership is the most straightforward form of property ownership. It grants the owner absolute control over the asset during their lifetime and upon their death – assuming that the necessary estate documents are in place. This type of ownership conveys outright control, allowing for gifts and bequests. However, assets under sole ownership are susceptible to creditor claims, which is an important consideration. Solely owned assets become part of the owner’s gross estate and must undergo probate upon death.
Income Tax Implications
With sole ownership, all income generated from the asset is attributed to the owner and reported on their federal and state income tax return(s).
Gift Tax Implications
An individual can gift solely owned assets to individuals or charities during their lifetime, subject to gift tax rules.
Estate Tax Implications
Upon death, the full fair market value of the asset is included in the owner’s gross estate and is subject to probate. However, probate is bypassed if a “will substitute” is employed. Generally, an asset receives a step-up in basis to its value on the date of the owner’s death, unless the six month alternative valuation date is utilized.
Tenancy in Common: Shared Ownership
Tenancy in common involves co-ownership of the property where tenants own undivided rights. Each tenant possesses a fractional interest, and ownership can be equal or unequal. Tenants in common retain control over their fractional interest and can transfer it as gifts or bequests. However, it might be more challenging to sell or transfer fractional interests.
Income Tax Implications
Income is attributed and taxed based on each individual’s fractional ownership share.
Gift Tax Implications
Converting individual ownership to tenancy in common or making gifts of fractional interests triggers gift tax considerations.
Estate Tax Implications
Upon death, the decedent’s fractional interest in the property held as tenants in common is included in their estate. The fractional share receives a step-up in basis.
Joint Tenancy with Right of Survivorship: Joint Ownership
Joint tenancy with the right of survivorship grants co-owners undivided rights to enjoy the property. Upon a joint tenant’s death, their interest automatically passes to the surviving joint tenants. This type of ownership bypasses probate but may interfere with specific estate planning goals.
Considerations During Lifetime
Joint tenants can sever ownership or transfer their interest, but sales or loans against the property require consent from other joint tenants. Creditors can reach a joint tenant’s interest.
Considerations at Death
Upon death, a joint tenant’s interest passes directly to surviving tenants, bypassing probate. However, it might not align with the decedent’s estate plan. There can also be liquidity challenges for the decedent’s estate.
Joint Tenancy with Right of Survivorship with Spouses
When spouses jointly own property, each spouse’s interest is presumed to be equal, regardless of their contribution. This form of ownership differs from joint ownership between non-spouses.
Income Tax Implications?
Jointly owned asset income is attributed equally for married couples filing jointly.
Gift Tax Implications
Transferring property to joint tenancy between spouses who are U.S. citizens triggers the marital gift tax deduction.
Estate Tax Implications
One-half of the property’s value is included in the decedent spouse’s estate, subject to the marital deduction. Any mortgage on joint property affects estate tax.
Joint Tenancy with Right of Survivorship with Non-Spouses
All joint tenancies, whether between spouses or non-spouses, involve equal ownership among joint tenants.
Income Tax Implications
Income from jointly held property is distributed equally among joint tenants, facilitating income splitting.
Gift Tax Implications
Converting individual ownership to joint ownership triggers taxable gifts.
Estate Tax Implications
The Internal Revenue Code states that the value of a decedent’s gross estate shall include the entire value of the property that the decedent held at the time of their death, with two exceptions:
- The joint property holder (survivor) contributed to the purchase of the property
- The decedent and the remaining joint property holder(s) received the property by inheritance or gift
This means that the entire fair market value of the property will be included in the first decedent’s estate, unless it can be proved that the surviving owner contributed to the purchase of the asset. This is known as the Contribution Rule, which applies only to property owned jointly with non-spouses’ right to survivorship.
Tenancy by the Entirety: Spousal Co-Ownership
Tenancy by the entirety applies exclusively to spouses, offering protection from creditors’ claims. Tenancy by the entirety is similar to joint tenancy. It ensures the right of survivorship between spouses with respect to income, gift, and estate tax considerations. When one spouse dies, the property owned as tenants by the entirety automatically passes to the surviving spouse. One-half of the value will be included in the decedent’s gross estate, subject to a marital deduction in the decedent’s estate. The surviving spouse will receive a step-up in basis on one-half of the value of the property.
However, unlike a joint tenancy with the right of survivorship, while both spouses are alive and married to each other one spouse cannot terminate a tenancy by the entirety without the consent from the other spouse. The advantage of this type of ownership is that the creditors of one spouse cannot attach the other spouse’s interest in the property. This is in contrast to joint tenancy with the right of survivorship, where a creditor of one owner can attach the debtor’s interest in the property. Although a lien can be attached to property held as tenants by the entirety, a creditor cannot force liquidation of the property, and any claim against the property can only be satisfied when the property is sold.
Life Estates and Remainder Interests: Split Ownership
Split ownership divides the property into a life estate (temporary ownership during the lifetime) and a remainder interest (ownership after the life estate ends).
Life Tenant’s Interest
Life tenants retain usage rights and responsibilities for the property. The remainder interest is protected from creditors.
Remainder Beneficiary’s Interest
Remainder beneficiaries have vested ownership but can’t claim full ownership until the life tenant’s death.
Income Tax Implications
Life tenants report income from the asset, while remainder beneficiaries report income upon receiving property.
Gift Tax Implications
Gifts involving life estates and remainder interests entail taxable gifts. The annual exclusion can be used to offset the value of the taxable gift for the life tenant However, the annual exclusion will not be available to offset the gift of the remainder interest, because a remainder interest is a future interest in the trust.
Estate Tax Implications
If someone creates a life estate for themselves, and they retain the right to the property until death, the fair market value of the property will be included in their gross estate at death. The remainderman will receive a full step-up in basis of the property upon the life tenant’s death.
If someone instead receives a life estate and they do not have any control over the disposition of the asset at their death, the value of the life estate would not be included in the life tenant’s gross estate at death. The remainderman will still receive a full step-up in basis of the property at the life tenant’s death.
Ownership Type | How Passed at Death? | Included in Probate? | Included in Gross Estate? | Qualifies for Marital Deduction? | Beneficiary Cost Basis |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sole ownership |
Will/intestacy |
Yes – 100%, unless designated beneficiary |
Yes – 100% of FMV |
If passed to a qualifying spouse |
FMV at death or Alternative Valuation Date |
Tenants in common |
Will/intestacy |
Yes – % owned, unless designated beneficiary |
Yes – % of FMV owned |
If passed to a qualifying spouse |
% of FMV at death or Alternative Valuation Date |
Joint with spouse |
Operation of law |
No |
Yes – 50% of FMV |
50% of FMV |
50% of FMV at death or Alternative Valuation Date + Beneficiary’s basis |
Joint with non-spouse |
Operation of law |
No |
Yes – 100% of FMV (unless can prove the other joint tenant contributed) |
No |
% of FMV at death or Alternative Valuation Date + Beneficiary’s basis |
Tenants by the entirety |
Operation of law |
No |
Yes – 50% of FMV |
50% of FMV |
50% of FMV at death or Alternative Valuation Date + Beneficiary’s basis |
Create a life estate |
Automatically to the remainder beneficiary |
No |
Yes – 100% of FMV |
If passed to a qualifying spouse |
FMV to the remainder beneficiary |
Receive a life estate |
Automatically to the remainder beneficiary |
No |
No |
No |
FMV to the remainder beneficiary |
Navigating the various options of property ownership is essential in creating an effective estate plan. Each form brings distinct tax considerations and implications that can significantly impact your financial legacy. To make more informed decisions, consult with your financial planner at Cardinal Point and estate planning professionals who can guide you toward strategies that best align with your particular goals.
Destination – Retirement
As summer comes to an end, many people are cramming in last-minute vacations. I was able to enjoy some cooler weather this summer in the beautiful mountain town of Telluride, Colorado, and I am looking forward to a weekend trip to the red rocks of Sedona, Arizona.
Those who know me well know that I truly enjoy planning trips. Weeks or even months before any trip, I’ll start doing quite a bit of research. Whether it’s a short weekend excursion or a two week trip, part of the fun for me is the planning. I’ll research where we will stay (hotel, condo, or cabin?), how much we can spend, what attractions and restaurants are in the area, and I’ll even look at the restaurant menus. By the time I arrive at a destination, I already feel as if I know it pretty well.
Summary and Takeaways
The non-financial aspects of retirement planning, which are often overlooked or neglected, are essential. That’s because they help ensure a more rewarding experience and overall quality of life as a retiree. You would definitely plan where to go, what to do, and how to make the most of an annual vacation. But the typical retirement lasts 20 or 30 years, so planning how and where to spend it is extraordinarily important. This article offers expert tips and simple but insightful exercises you can take advantage of to create a successful and fulfilling non-financial retirement plan.
Key Takeaways
- Retirees are happier when they live in a place they love that offers convenient access to leisure activities, recreation, and a variety of other retirement lifestyle amenities.
- Retirement is more enjoyable when supported by a vibrant social life and opportunities to continue connecting with friends and family while also making new friends.
- It is important that you feel a real sense of purpose to motivate you and give genuine meaning to your retirement.
- Launch a second career, go back to college, get involved in community volunteerism, take up new hobbies, or travel and see the world.
- Maintaining good health as you age is also vital so that you can continue to derive the most joy from an active retirement.
I mention vacation planning because it has been said that most people spend more time planning a vacation than they do planning for the non-financial aspects of retirement. While it is essential to have a solid financial plan in place for retirement, money isn’t the only factor in the equation of a happy retirement.
Examples of non-financial retirement planning include:
- Developing a sense of purpose and meaning
- Maintaining social connections and building new ones
- Planning for healthy aging
- Identifying leisure activities and hobbies
Below are a few parallels between vacation and retirement planning:
Vacation |
Retirement |
When am I going? Winter, spring, summer, fall? |
What year do I plan to retire? |
Where am I going? |
Where will I live? |
What is my budget? |
What is my net worth? How is my cash flow? |
Do I have an itinerary? |
How will I spend my days and what kind of lifestyle do I want? |
Am I going with anyone else? |
Will I be near my friends and family? |
Are there good restaurants? |
What are the options and amenities for entertainment and recreation? |
Do I need to rent a car? Is the area walkable? |
Do I have a wellness plan to stay active and physically fit? |
Will I need travel insurance? |
Will I have adequate health insurance, including long-term care coverage? |
Do I have the required travel documents? |
Do I have my estate planning documents in order? |
Keep in mind that retirement isn’t just an extended vacation, but a major life transition. And, like many transitions (graduation, starting a career, moving, marriage, having children) retirement can be challenging if you are not fully prepared. Experts working in the retirement field generally suggest that you invest at least 18 to 24 months to develop your non-financial retirement plans.
Here’s an exercise that can get you started and help you develop a vision of what you want your retirement to look like. Ask yourself these clarifying questions:
- What aspects of your current life do you treasure the most?
- What new skills would you like to learn?
- With whom do you want to spend more time, and where would you prefer to spend it?
- What’s one life goal you haven’t yet fulfilled?
- Imagine it’s a weekday morning and you’re retired. What would you like to do today?
The average life expectancy in the U.S. is currently 81 years of age for women and 77 for men. According to the Social Security Administration, one in four people who reach their 65th birthday will most likely live until at least age 90. Twenty-five to 30 years is a long time to spend in retirement, and deserves thoughtful strategic planning!
Another exercise is to plan your perfect day and week in retirement. After all, for most of those who are approaching retirement their weekday schedules for the last 30 years were completely booked, from nine to five. But retirement gives you at least 40 more hours per week of free time – to spend any way you want!
My Perfect Day in Retirement
Morning |
|
Afternoon |
|
Evening |
My Perfect Week in Retirement
Sunday |
Morning Afternoon Evening |
Monday |
Morning Afternoon Evening |
Tuesday |
Morning Afternoon Evening |
Wednesday |
Morning Afternoon Evening |
Thursday |
Morning Afternoon Evening |
Friday |
Morning Afternoon Evening |
Saturday |
Morning Afternoon Evening |
You may notice that while it’s quite easy to fill up your schedule for one day, filling up the entire week is a bit more difficult. That’s why taking the time to complete these types of exercises before your retirement can make your transition into retirement smoother and more intentional. Get to know your retirement destination before you arrive! If you are nearing retirement and would like more information and guidance regarding both financial and non-financial retirement planning, reach out to your Cardinal Point advisor.
Cross Border Financial Planning – Non-Arm’s Length Cross-Border Gifting
The desire to gift assets between parties where a personal relationship exists constitutes a non-arm’s length transaction. Gifting is often born from an innate wish to see those who are closest to you enjoy the fruits of your successful financial life. That’s true whether it’s to celebrate or commemorate a birthday, wedding, graduation, job promotion, anniversary, or other milestone – or just to share your generosity. There are also other reasons why gifts may be made, such as:
- Grandparents may want to help their grandchildren pay for higher education as college tuitions skyrocket.
- Spouses may decide to retitle assets held in individual accounts into a joint account, for estate or tax planning purposes.
- Parents often make a gift of down payment funds to help a child purchase their first home.
- Sentimental art or jewelry can be passed from parent to child as a gift.
- Aunts or uncles may want to gift an automobile to a niece or nephew.
But when viewing such scenarios through a cross-border lens, it’s vital to know how gifts may be affected by financial and taxation rules and regulations based on such things as the immigration, residency, and relationship status of the donor and recipient. The type of asset being gifted as well as where the asset is domiciled (for example, Canada vs. the U.S) should also be considered. The following article explains some of the nuances of non-arm’s length gifting including non-charitable gifts, and examines common scenarios to help you strategically plan your gifts for the greater benefit of both you and the designated recipient.
Summary and Takeaways
When you gift assets to someone with whom you share a personal relationship, that is deemed a non-arm’s length transaction. A mother may give family heirloom jewelry to her daughter. A grandparent may help pay a grandchild’s tuition, or an uncle may give his nephew an automobile as a graduation present. But if it is a cross-border transaction, it may be subject to complex financial and taxation rules and regulations which can be difficult to grasp. This article provides information to help you understand the rules so you can comply with them while taking steps to avoid unnecessary taxation and preserve your wealth.
Key Takeaways
- When planning for non-arm’s length gift giving in a cross border context, important considerations include both the donor’s and the beneficiary’s country of residence and immigration status.
- Those – and the nature of the personal relationship – will play a significant role in your planning. So will the type of asset that is being bestowed and what country it is located in at the time the gift transaction occurs.
- If the gift is tuition, you may want to use a 529 savings plan – but that can require filing specific tax documents when you provide the funds to the recipient.
- Also note that the U.S. lifetime gift tax exemption in 2023 is $12.92 million, but will revert to only $5.49 million starting in 2026
Grandparents Gifting Money to Grandchildren for College Education
Scenario A Assumptions
- Dual citizen grandparents and grandchildren residing in the U.S.
- Cash domiciled in the U.S. represents the gift
In this specific case, one common gifting option suggests that the grandparents contribute funds to their grandchild’s 529 education plan. Details about 529 plans can be found in Cardinal Point’s Ebook: Cross-Border Implications of Holding a 529 Plan. For the tax year 2023, the annual gift tax exclusion to a non-spouse beneficiary is $17,000 USD. If both grandma and grandpa were to perform gift splitting, the annual gift tax exclusion is doubled. In the latter case, a gift tax Form 709 would need to be prepared and filed with the same due date as the grandparents’ U.S. income tax return. No gift tax would be owed given the current lifetime gift and estate tax exemption amount of $12.92M USD per person (2023).
From time to time, grandparents choose to “front load” the 529 plan by contributing up to five years’ worth ($170K USD for 2023) of annual gift tax exclusion funds to a grandchild’s 529 account. In this case, no additional excludible contributions can be made for another five years. Even if front loading of the 529 plan via cash gifts beyond the annual gift tax exclusion took place, it is unlikely that gift tax would be owed − unless the current lifetime gift and estate tax exemptions dramatically fell or if grandma and grandpa had already used up their lifetime exemption. There will be an additional tax preparation cost, but that is normally not very significant. Keep in mind that although the IRS does not allow a tax deduction for contributions to a 529 plan, some states do. Furthermore, some states also set contribution limits for 529 plans.
Scenario B Assumptions
- Canadian citizen / U.S. Green card holder grandparents residing in the U.S.
- Grandparents properly exited Canada and filed their Canadian departure / exit tax return when they moved to the U.S.
- Canadian-only parents and grandchildren residing in Canada
- Cash located in the U.S. is the gift consideration
Unlike Scenario A, Canada has a separate college funding account mechanism called a Registered Education Savings Plan (RESP). For more information on RESPs visit Cardinal Point’s blog on Canada & U.S. Education Savings Options. The U.S. tax resident grandparents can help fund the RESP and allow those contributions to attract Canadian Education Savings Grants (CESG) from the Canadian government.
From a Canadian tax perspective, neither the grandparents, parents, nor grandchildren need to report the gift. In instances other than a contribution to a registered plan, income attribution rules would need to be considered – but those complex laws are beyond the scope of this article.
From a U.S. tax perspective, it is unlikely there would be a need to report the gift on a U.S. gift tax Form 709, since contribution limits on RESPs are much less than in the U.S. Although the amount of contributions are significantly less in RESPs than in 529 plans, the cost of tuition in Canada is typically substantially lower.
It’s important to note that there are U.S. income tax issues for U.S. tax residents when they are the subscriber on a Canadian RESP. Therefore, in this case, if the U.S. grandparents wanted to partake in subscriber duties, the income within the RESP would become taxable to them in the U.S., which is something to avoid. If a non-U.S. person were the subscriber the tax liability would be much lower.
Scenario C Assumptions
- Canadian citizen / resident, non-U.S. citizen grandparents
- Dual citizen grandchildren residing in the U.S. who plan to attend college in the U.S.
- Cash located in Canada in Canadian dollars for gift consideration
This scenario is not as common as the first two. The tax benefits of an RESP for a child planning to attend a U.S. college are not consistent with Scenario B. That said, grandparents can gift funds to their grandchild’s 529 plan − but have the additional hurdle of FX rates to overcome. If this scenario were to occur, Cardinal Point has business relationships with online FX providers to optimize FX rates between CAD and USD.
From a Canadian tax perspective, any income (not including realized capital gains) generated by the gift to the minor grandchild would technically need to be attributed back to the grandparent since 529 accounts are not recognized in Canada for their tax-sheltered status.
If the Canadian resident grandparents subscribe to an RESP instead of a 529 plan for their U.S. resident grandchildren, be aware that the grandchildren will not be able to access the CESG (government grant) portion of the RESP unless they become Canadian residents while attending their university.
From a U.S. tax perspective, if the gift exceeded $100K USD equivalent, a “Form 3520, Annual Return to Report Transactions With Foreign Trusts and Receipt of Certain Foreign Gifts” would need to be filed by the owner of the 529 account for the year of gift.
For these reasons, this scenario is uncommon.
Gifting in Estate Planning – Retitling Assets from Individual to Joint Tenancy with Rights of Survivorship
In many good estate plans, “will substitutes” are maximized in order to avoid probate. This is done by retitling assets owned individually into joint tenancy, so the surviving tenant can maintain full control of the asset after the death of the other. The transfer to the survivor happens outside of probate. This alleviates potential tax owed on the decedent’s ownership of the asset (if certain elections are made on the decedent’s tax return) and allows the survivor to avoid lengthy court proceedings to distribute their late spouse’s estate at a time when they are grieving the loss. Furthermore, probate costs are minimized. It should be noted that tax-advantaged plans such as an RRSP, TFSA, Roth IRA, and Traditional IRA, can only be owned individually. But retirement plans such as these can have beneficiary designations allowing the inherited funds to also avoid the probate process.
Assuming both spouses are comfortable with amalgamating applicable assets into joint titling, there is an unconscious “gift” that takes place. This is true whether the asset and/or person resides in Canada or the U.S. Multiple scenarios can quickly develop, and we will outline a few of those below.
Scenario A – Canadian citizen and resident spouses
Forms are required for non-real estate assets in order to reregister the individual bank and non-registered accounts into joint tenancy. There is a deemed disposition for the original owner at cost, resulting in a continuation of that spouse’s original book value for their 50% share of the joint account. Canadian income tax rules dictate that all income and capital gains within the joint accounts attribute back to the original owner prior to the reregistration. The original owner still reports all the income, but upon their death probate may be avoided.
With respect to changes in real estate titling, there are a couple of additional items to consider. The method of title transfer is a more formal process, typically via an attorney deeding the property title transfer. Secondly, there can be a land transfer tax, and in some jurisdictions (i.e., Toronto), there is both a provincial and municipal land transfer tax. This can easily result in tens of thousands of dollars of taxes when retitling, given the “deemed disposition” for these types of assets. Fortunately, in Ontario, retitling the property between spouses exempts the property from land transfer tax.
Scenario B – Dual citizen spouses residing in the U.S. who plan on returning to Canada in a few years
As U.S. citizens, spouses are entitled to the unlimited marital gift tax exemption. This allows spouses to transfer an unlimited amount of assets or gifts between one another. Therefore, if all assets are domiciled in the U.S., any shift from individual to joint tenancy avoids income and gift tax altogether. There is no “deemed disposition” as there would be in the case of Canadian residency. However, it is a good idea to file a gift tax return to report and document that the transfer is eligible for the unlimited marital exemption.
Scenario C – Dual citizen husband residing in the U.S. with Canadian citizen / U.S. Green Card wife residing in the U.S. There are U.S. “situs” assets only.
Without U.S. citizenship, special rules apply if the recipient spouse is a U.S. Green Card holder. For non-U.S. citizen spouses, the marital deduction is limited to $175,000 USD for tax year 2023. Therefore, attempting to create a smooth estate plan by retitling applicable assets into joint names could potentially trigger negative U.S. gift tax consequences. Let’s look at an example.
John is a U.S. citizen and Jane is a Canadian citizen with a U.S. Green Card. John has a taxable brokerage account worth $2M USD. John would like to minimize gaps in his estate plan and maximize future income tax splitting in preparation for his move to Canada, by adding Jane on the account title. If John were to follow through with that plan, he would be gifting 50% of the account, or $1M USD, into Jane’s name. However, this gift exceeds the maximum marital deduction to a non-U.S. citizen spouse by $825K USD. Essentially, John would have to file a U.S. Form 709 Gift Tax Return and decrease his lifetime gift and estate tax exemption amount from $12.92M USD to $12.09M USD or less. This may seem insignificant, but tax laws are in flux and in 2025 the current lifetime gift and estate tax exemption amounts are scheduled to revert to what they were prior to the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. Future exemption levels could be substantially lower, resulting in John having a smaller unused Lifetime Gift and Estate Tax Exemption available at his death.
In Summary
Domestic or cross-border gifting strategies involving non-arms-length transactions can take many different forms, each requiring its own unique strategies and considerations. We’ve outlined just a few in this article, and with any type of gift the Canadian and U.S. tax issues and corresponding opportunities are important to understand and dissect. The immigration, residency, and relationship status of the donor and recipient have significant implications when it comes to cross-border financial planning. That’s why it is critical that you integrate and coordinate your gift giving plans in full alignment with your overall cross-border investment, tax, and estate planning. The educational insights provided in this article are general in nature, but to review your specific circumstances and objectives, please contact Cardinal Point.
Cross Border Wealth Management: Navigating your RESP
College funding for children is constantly on parents’ minds, as the cost of tuition continues to skyrocket with no end in sight. That has heightened parents’ and grandparents’ desire to maximize college savings, by utilizing financial tools such as the Registered Education Savings Plan (RESP) in Canada. But what happens if circumstances change and the family relocates to the U.S.? Or what if your son or daughter attends a university in the U.S.? How might your current RESP planning be impacted, and what strategies should you implement to overcome potential hurdles? This article speaks to these concerns while providing insightful examples to help you navigate the complexities of college savings in a cross-border context.
Summary and Takeaways
Many parents and grandparents take advantage of the Registered Education Savings Plan (RESP) in Canada, to help fund the education of children and grandchildren. But these days it is increasingly common for either the Canadian student to attend a university in the U.S. or for their family to move across the border. That can further complicate the ways that an RESP is utilized, but this article provides information to help manage those complexities to gain the most benefit from an RESP.
Key Takeaways
- There are certain tax considerations regarding withdrawals from RESPs, as well as corresponding solutions to help minimize taxes and maximize savings.
- Those are based on variables such as the beneficiary’s tax status, whether their siblings will attend college, and usage of Accumulated Income Payments to fund the RESP.
- In cross-border situations, the United States may require U.S. taxpayers to report income from the RESP and pay taxes on it. But there are ways to help avoid such scenarios.
- Cross-border financial and tax planning is always challenging, and the circumstances impacting the RESP may change – requiring adjustments and updates to your plans.
- That’s why it is advantageous to consult an experienced cross-border financial professional to help navigate the nuances of saving for college tuition, within a cross-border context.
Case Study Scenario #1: The RESP subscriber remains in Canada and the beneficiary attends a Canadian post-secondary education institution.
This is the simplest circumstance to dissect, since the RESP was designed for this specific scenario. As contributions, government grants, and earnings within the RESP accrue, buckets of income are formed. There are various withdrawal strategies available, based upon the beneficiary’s tax status, the number of remaining siblings who will attend college, and the subscriber’s utilization of accumulated income payments (AIP) to fund their RRSP (up to certain thresholds). For more information surrounding the basic mechanics of the RESP please read Cardinal Point’s article: Cross-Border Transition Planning – RESPs.
As post-secondary educational costs are realized, the taxation of RESP withdrawals is as follows:
- Original contributions (used for Post-Secondary Education or PSE) are non-taxable
- Grants and investment earnings (Education Assistance Payment or EAP) are taxable to the beneficiary and subject to certain withdrawal restrictions
Depending on the beneficiary’s part-time employment opportunities, it’s possible that they may owe taxes on some portion of the EAP bucket.
Case Study Scenario #2: The RESP subscriber is a U.S. resident and the beneficiary attends college in Canada.
In this scenario, the RESP is susceptible to annual taxation in the U.S., reported on the subscriber’s U.S. tax return and disclosure as an “other” foreign financial asset. This is due to the U.S. view of the RESP, which sees it as a standard taxable brokerage account. The subscriber needs to report any realized capital gains and/or dividends and interest income on their U.S. tax return. For this reason, some families transfer RESP subscribership duties to a close friend or family member who is a Canadian resident and not a U.S. taxpayer. There are pros and cons to this strategy, but it does alleviate the U.S. tax reporting issues for the U.S. subscriber.
Assuming the beneficiary attends a higher education institution in Canada, the same income taxation results detailed in Case Study #1 apply. But there is one exception. There would be no benefit gained by the student transferring a portion of their education credit to the U.S. parent (unless the U.S. parent had Canadian-sourced income and was required to file a Canadian tax return themselves). All RESP withdrawals are taxable to the beneficiary who then includes the T4A EAP distributions on their T1 as a Canadian resident. Keep in mind that each Canadian resident has access to annual basic personal amounts (BPA). This is a non-refundable tax credit that can be claimed by all individuals to provide a full reduction from federal income tax to all individuals on their taxable income up to the BPA. This is an important detail for Canadian resident students to note when withdrawing EAP while attending colleges and universities in Canada.
Case Study Scenario #3: Both the subscriber and beneficiary are U.S. residents, and the beneficiary plans to get their post-secondary education at a U.S. institution.
In both the second and third scenarios, it would have been necessary to open the RESP while both the subscriber and beneficiary were Canadian residents. Now let’s assume that the subscriber has not shifted their RESP duties to a Canadian resident and continues to report the annual RESP income on their U.S. tax return. All income, inclusive of capital gains within the RESP, needs to be converted to USD and reported and taxed in the U.S., which can lead to increased tax liability and tax preparation costs. Furthermore, if the aggregate total of the maximum market value of all foreign (non-U.S.) financial accounts is greater than $10K USD (a very low bar), an FBAR/FinCEN 114 disclosure report needs to be electronically filed. The taxpayer may also need to include a Form 8938 (higher thresholds) with their U.S. tax return. It’s debatable whether the RESP is considered a foreign trust, but recent IRS Revenue Procedure 2020-17 suggests that Forms 3520/3520-A are no longer required for RESPs.
From the beneficiary’s perspective, any income withdrawn from the RESP needs to be allocated to a specific bucket (PSE vs EAP). In the case of PSE, this is seen as a non-taxable return of capital to the subscriber. These payments represent after-tax contributions to the RESP. If withdrawals include EAP, then as a non-resident of Canada grants need to be repaid to the Canadian government and any earnings necessitate a 25% non-resident withholding tax payable to CRA on behalf of the beneficiary. But the beneficiary does not need to report the EAP on a U.S. tax return, since the account is only taxable to the subscriber.
Conclusion
Tax-related information is a powerful and essential tool to help you strategically plan optimal methods of navigating Canadian assets such as the RESP, RRSP, LIRA, and TFSA. As cross-border financial planners we are in a unique position to examine the intricacies of complex cross-border wealth management scenarios, including those regarding your RESP within Canada or the U.S. Although we only explored three commonly experienced scenarios, there are many other possibilities. To unpack your specific circumstances and learn applicable solutions and strategies, please contact Cardinal Point.
- « Previous Page
- 1
- …
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- …
- 60
- Next Page »