From The Globe and Mail article:
Mr. Ritchie says he increasingly receives inquiries from well-to-do Canadian retirees who want to spend even more time at their homes in sunny Florida, California or Arizona than the rules allow…
Cardinal Point Wealth Management
Your Cross-Border Financial Advisor
From The Globe and Mail article:
Mr. Ritchie says he increasingly receives inquiries from well-to-do Canadian retirees who want to spend even more time at their homes in sunny Florida, California or Arizona than the rules allow…
A large number of the clients that we work with are those that move from Canada to the United States. In these cases, we spend quite a bit of time making our clients aware of the income tax implications of leaving Canada and establishing tax residency in the U.S. We have written many publications on this topic, including a recent article, “Moving from Canada to the United States: What You Need to Know.”
For many of these people transitioning from Canada to the U.S., some of their larger financial assets are held within their registered plans (RRSPs, LIRAs, RRIFs, etc.). Given that our firm is properly registered and licensed in both Canada and the U.S., we can provide ongoing financial planning, tax and investment management for our clients who choose to leave their registered assets in Canada.
The article reviews the tax implications for Canadians moving to the United States, particularly concerning the withdrawal of funds from Registered Retirement Savings Plans (RRSPs). It highlights the firm’s experience in managing financial planning, tax, and investment for clients who retain their RRSPs in Canada, navigating both Canadian and U.S. tax systems. Tax withholding rates on RRSP withdrawals vary depending on the individual’s tax residency status and the amount withdrawn. For residents of Canada, the tax withheld ranges from 10% to 30%, whereas non-residents are generally subject to a 25% withholding rate, which can be reduced to 15% under specific conditions outlined in the Canada-U.S. Tax Treaty. The article emphasizes the importance of proper departure planning to ensure that the appropriate tax residency status is recorded to avoid unnecessary tax implications. Additionally, it mentions the potential for non-residents to file a Canadian income tax return under Section 217 in certain circumstances to benefit from Canadian tax deductions and credits.
By leaving these assets in Canada, continued tax deferral in Canada and most U.S. states will continue. The State of California, however, has a different set of tax rules that relate to registered plans that remain in Canada. See our article, “California Residents: Does Your Financial Advisor Tax-Manage Your RRSPs?”
As we develop our clients’ comprehensive Canada/U.S. financial plans, discussions and decisions with respect to taking distributions from their RRSPs for future lifestyle or retirement planning purposes are reviewed. For the vast majority of our clients, RRSPs continue to be managed by us through our Canadian institutional custodian until clients retire or are required to convert their RRSP to a RRIF.
However, what if one was looking to take a distribution from their RRSP as a non-resident of Canada prior to retirement, i.e. for the down payment on a new U.S. home or to meet current lifestyle requirements?
Let’s first review the tax impact of de-registering a Canadian RRSP before becoming a U.S. tax resident. As a resident of Canada, distributions from an RRSP are be subject to ordinary income tax rates depending on the province of tax residency. The bank or custodian holding the RRSP would be obligated to withhold tax upon the RRSP distribution at the following rates:
Withdrawal Amount | % Federal Tax Withheld |
From $0 to $5,000 | 10% (5% in Quebec) |
From $5,001 to $15,000 | 20% (10% in Quebec) |
Greater than $15,000 | 30% (15% in Quebec) |
The withholding tax rates above would only be applied for those individuals who would still be considered tax residents of Canada. If one were to become a U.S. tax resident or non-resident of Canada, the Canadian withholding tax imposed on distributions would be 25%. Under Article XVIII(2) of the Canada-U.S. Tax Treaty, distributions from RRSPs/RRIFs can be reduced to 15% under certain and very specific guidelines. This would generally only be the case if one was to convert their RRSP to a RRIF and take periodic distributions from the RRIF. Under the Canada-U.S. Tax Treaty, this would include payments out of a RRIF where the total amount paid in the current year does not exceed twice the “minimum amount” and 10% of the value of the RRIF at the beginning of the tax year. The “minimum amount” is determined by a percentage factor based on the RRIF holder’s age at the beginning of the tax year.
Some Canadian financial advisors and individuals believe that the above table of withholding tax rates would be applied irrespective of Canadian and U.S. tax residency, which is incorrect. If the departure planning is done properly, then the Canadian institution should have the correct U.S. address on record and the tax residency indicated as a non-resident of Canada. This would generally be acknowledged by the bank or custodian via the completion of CRA Form NR301 and IRS W-9 form at the time the account becomes tagged as a non-resident of Canada account. Therefore, a 25% Canadian withholding tax would apply for lump-sum distributions.
If the individual or advisor still maintains a Canadian address on the account while claiming to no longer be a tax resident of Canada, they are opening themselves up for a number of issues. For example, the ability of an advisor to properly and legally manage registered accounts can be problematic, and so can the indication to CRA that Canadian residency is maintained (though the use of a Canadian address) when a previously filed Canadian tax return indicates a date of departure from Canada.
In some unique situations, former residents of Canada might be able to file a Canadian income tax return as a non-resident under Section 217. Filing a return under this election allows a non-resident to file a Canadian tax return if it would be beneficial for them to do so. In this case, the non-resident taxpayer would be able to claim the same deductions and credits as that of a traditional Canadian taxpayer. There are limited reasons for a non-resident to make this election. One reason is when an individual has a non-working spouse in the U.S. with, for example, $50,000 in their RRSP. In this case, the individual could withdraw the RRSP tax free over five years without paying any Canadian income tax. Conversely, if the non-working spouse withdrew the $50,000 in a lump sum, there would be a 25% withholding tax imposed at the time of distribution.
As part of our comprehensive wealth management process, and based on our clients’ specific financial planning objectives, we can provide an RRSP distribution analysis to review the options available and the related Canada and U.S. income tax results. Further, because we manage our investment and retirement accounts on a Canada/U.S. tax-effective basis (we understand tax!), we can ensure that withholding tax paid in Canada can be recovered over time through proper portfolio and tax management.
From the Insurance & Investment Journal article:
Managing cross-border clients is a challenging area for advisors that requires thorough knowledge on how to handle life insurance, investments, taxes and pensions while respecting two countries’ rules and regulations.
The Insurance and Investment Journal spoke to U.S-Canada cross-border expert Terry Ritchie, a director at Cardinal Point Wealth Management, who’s specialized in the field for more than 25 years to find some answers. He says if you don’t have knowledge or experience it is very easy to mess things up for your client.
Estate planning issues can create family discord, especially in cases in which there is a sizable inheritance and heirs have disparate circumstances and competing interests.
“You seem to know people,” says Terry Ritchie, director of cross border wealth services with Cardinal Point Capital Management Inc. in Calgary, “but when someone dies and there’s money [involved], their real colours come through.”
Managing delicate family dynamics can be challenging, Ritchie adds, but there is much you can do as a financial advisor to prevent and minimize potential conflict. Ritchie offers the following advice for helping clients keep family peace before and during a wealth transfer:
Encourage open dialogue
Ritchie recommends hosting a family meeting that includes the client and all the beneficiaries of the estate as part of the estate planning process. Heirs who are unable to attend in person can connect by speaker phone or online. The conversation should cover how the wealth transfer will unfold and issues unique to that case that might arise.
As the financial advisor, you are in a position to address family members’ questions about the ins and outs of the wealth transfer. For example, you can field questions that may arise regarding taxes, which can complicate the process, especially if there are cross-border tax issues.
But the level of disclosure you get into — such as the client’s net worth and the distribution of assets — is your client’s call. Ritchie lets his clients decide whether it makes sense for him, as the advisor, to communicate with the family. Once he has the approval to engage the family, he is careful to treat the children equally and be up-front about how he’s helping their parents.
Improve your client knowledge
Expand the scope of your discovery process to include getting to know your clients’ family dynamics. Ritchie usually holds an in-depth conversation with clients about how their children are faring, asking if there are any issues he should be aware of that could complicate the wealth transfer.
For example, Ritchie becomes attuned to the marital status and financial circumstances of his clients’ children, which helps him get a better sense of their motivations. By becoming familiar with your clients’ children, you create an opportunity to continue a relationship with that generation.
“I have a pretty good understanding of the cast of characters I might be dealing with in the future,” Ritchie says. “Many advisors don’t go that deep.”
Take the heat
If your client feels caught in the middle of an intractable sibling rivalry over the inheritance, Ritchie says, help ease the stress by acting as an intermediary.
He has faced situations in which clients’ children want to dictate the terms of how and when the assets will be distributed. In one case, one sibling felt that the wealth was being divided unfairly, because others were receiving a larger portion to include their children.
In such cases, Ritchie will take on the role of “bad cop,” enforcing the client’s expressed wishes and explaining the reasons behind the decision.
When the children prove relentless in pushing for their preferences, he often tells his clients: “Don’t be the bad guy, let me be the bad guy.”
Affluent individuals living in the United States often use a U.S. revocable living trust (RLT) for estate-planning purposes. Such a trust provides confidentiality and flexibility in how assets are managed, as it eliminates the specter of probate.
A revocable living trust is transparent for U.S. income, gift and estate-tax purposes. The individual who transfers (settles) property to the trust is also its trustee and beneficiary. The trust is considered a U.S. grantor trust, which is ignored for U.S. income tax purposes. All income, losses and expenses are claimed on the individual’s personal U.S. tax return.
Moving to Canada: Canadian tax issues and administrative burdens
For individuals moving to Canada (both Canadian and U.S. citizens), continuing to hold a U.S. RLT will present tax and administrative challenges. Under Canadian tax laws, once the trustee(s) become residents of Canada, the trust will be considered a separate taxable entity and will be treated as a Canadian resident trust. This will then require the trustee(s) to not only file a Canadian Trust return but also to pick up all of the income earned by the trust on their personal Canadian and U.S. tax returns.
Although foreign tax credits can be used to reduce and/or eliminate double-taxation issues, continuing to hold the U.S. RLT complicates tax filings. Further, the trust would have both a Canadian and U.S. cost basis that would have to be tracked and reported. The Canadian basis would be equal to the value of the assets within the trust on the day the trustee(s) moved to Canada. The U.S. cost basis would be equal to the original value of the assets at the time they were acquired.
In some cases, an exception exists under Canadian tax law that allows the taxpayer to deem all the income and capital gains/losses associated with the trust property as taxable to the taxpayer as an individual, effectively making the trust disregarded for both U.S. and Canadian tax purposes. Under this exception, there would be no double taxation on income earned by the trust during the taxpayer’s lifetime.
Double Taxation at Death
Double taxation issues become a greater concern if the trustee happens to die as a Canadian resident after the trust had been in existence for 21 years. Under this scenario, the trust would form part of the trustee’s estate and, depending on the size of the estate, U.S. estate tax could be payable. In Canada, the trust would also be taxed once the assets were sold on or after the 21st year anniversary of the trust. There would be no foreign tax credits available to offset these two taxes, which could result in double taxation.
Subject to Canadian departure tax
Meanwhile, U.S. citizens temporarily living and working in Canada could be subjected to departure tax on their trust when they return to the United States. U.S. citizens are afforded a five-year period (See article: “Americans Exiting Canada: Understanding the Five-Year Deemed Disposition Rule”) living in Canada in which they are not subjected to Canadian departure tax upon a return to the United States. As stated earlier, because the trust is considered a separate legal entity from a Canadian tax perspective, it would not be granted the same five-year exemption from exit tax because it is not a personally owned asset.
Financial institutions unable to hold or administer trust
An additional complication, unrelated to the tax issues outlined above, is the fact that most U.S.-based financial institutions will not hold a U.S. RLT once the trustee becomes a resident of Canada.
Most U.S.-based financial institutions are not registered and licensed to oversee a taxable (or trust) investment account on behalf of a Canadian resident, even if that individual is a U.S. citizen. Many individuals try to get around this regulation by registering the U.S. RLT to a family or friend’s U.S. address. Not only is it illegal to misrepresent your residency, but it could also create tax issues because the IRS and state will continue to receive tax slips showing you live at a U.S.-based address.
Although it is a great estate-planning tool for those residing in the United States, a RLT presents many tax and administrative challenges once you move to Canada. For those individuals intending to live in Canada for the foreseeable future, it would likely be wise to unwind the trust structure before or soon after arriving in Canada. This would prevent any adverse Canadian income-tax consequences. At Cardinal Point, we assist individuals and families moving from the United States to Canada with their financial, tax and estate-planning needs. If you are moving to Canada and own a U.S. RLT, we can advise you on whether it is in your best interest to keep the entity intact or close it down.