Cardinal Point Wealth Management

Your Cross-Border Financial Advisor

Contact Us | Client Login
  • About Us
    • Our Story
    • Our Team
    • Our Clients
    • Legal and Compliance
    • Part 3 Form CRS
    • Relationship Disclosure Information
  • What We Do
    • Investment Management
    • Wealth Planning
    • Tax Planning and Preparation
    • Private Wealth Services-U.S.
    • Private Wealth Services-Canada
    • Cross Border Wealth Management, Financial and Tax Planning Advisor
    • Business Management for Athletes
  • Cross-Border Services
    • Cross Border Wealth Management, Financial and Tax Planning Advisor
    • U.S. citizens living in Canada
    • Moving to Canada from the U.S.
    • Canadians Living in the U.S.
    • Moving to the U.S. from Canada
    • Expatriates Living Abroad
  • Blog
  • About Us
    • Our Story
    • Our Team
    • Our Clients
    • Legal and Compliance
    • Part 3 Form CRS
    • Relationship Disclosure Information
  • What We Do
    • Investment Management
    • Wealth Planning
    • Tax Planning and Preparation
    • Private Wealth Services-U.S.
    • Private Wealth Services-Canada
    • Cross Border Wealth Management, Financial and Tax Planning Advisor
    • Business Management for Athletes
  • Cross-Border Services
    • Cross Border Wealth Management, Financial and Tax Planning Advisor
    • U.S. citizens living in Canada
    • Moving to Canada from the U.S.
    • Canadians Living in the U.S.
    • Moving to the U.S. from Canada
    • Expatriates Living Abroad
  • Blog

Is the Stock Market too Concentrated?

August 8, 2018 By Cardinal Point Wealth

It probably doesn’t come as a surprise that Amazon, Netflix, Microsoft, Apple, Alphabet and Facebook have been some of the best performing stocks in the first half of this year. But what may be surprising is that those six stocks made up 98% of the S&P 500 Index returns for the first half of 2018 according to a recent CNBC article1!

Many headlines over the last year have pointed out just how large these tech giants have grown For the first time since 20002, the tech sector now represents 25% of the S&P 500. When viewed another way, the market capitalization- the amount investors have deemed the companies are worth of the top (largest) five companies is approximately equal to the bottom (smallest) 282 companies in the S&P 500, as illustrated by the amazing pie chart below created by Michael Batnick of Ritholtz Wealth Management3.

 

Weight of top 5 companies in S&P 500 versus bottom 282 companies

cross border

 

In other words, the bottom 56% of the S&P 500 has the same market capitalization as the top 1%. That’s a lot of companies. Those 282 listed include many household names such as Chipotle, Kohl’s, Clorox and H&R Block, all of which are multi billion-dollar firms on their own. Which begs the question, is it typical for a handful of the largest companies to dominate an index?

It turns out that historically it’s not uncommon for the largest companies to represent an enormous percentage of the index. Today the largest 10 companies represent a little over 20% of the large cap space  That’s right about the average we’ve seen over the last few decades, and significantly lower than it was in the 1960s, according to a recent study by Travis Fairchild at O’Shaughnessy Asset Management4. This study also found that on average, about 6-7 of the top 10 names fall out of the top 10 within the following decade, suggesting that many of the current top ten companies will be replaced in the next ten years.

This phenomenon isn’t limited to just the U.S. According to Benjamin Felix of PWLCapital, through July 13th of this year, 75% of the S&P/TSX return came from just 10 of its 246 stocks, led by Suncor Energy, Toronto-Dominion Bank and Shopify5. This may lead you to ask, is there anything I should be doing as an investor to take advantage of this?

First off you should note that well diversified portfolios likely hold all the names mentioned in this piece; Amazon, Apple, TD, etc. are some of the largest holdings for most North American investors. But investing a portfolio solely in those largest companies has two pitfalls- undue concentration of risk and missed opportunities in other areas of the market.

The first pitfall of investing solely in individual names – even some of those red-hot tech stocks, came home to roost at the end of July. Both Facebook and Twitter reported earnings which fell short of market expectations. On July 26th, the day after their quarterly earnings announcement, Facebook fell by a whopping 19%, erasing $120 Billion USD in value! This amount is greater than the entire value of large companies like GE, Nike or Starbucks. A day later, following Twitter’s earnings announcement, that stock also fell 19%. Twitter had been one of the best performing stocks over the previous year prior to that announcement.

While these companies are included in most major stock market indexes, the performance of any individual company is going to be relatively small in comparison to the entire index- for example the S&P 500 was basically flat on July 26th, even with Facebook falling dramatically. But if you owned them individually- they would likely represent a far greater percentage of your overall assets.

Another major downside of only holding those largest of companies is missing out on large potential gains elsewhere. Small companies outperformed their large cap counterparts in the U.S. and Canada significantly over the second quarter of this year. And academic research shows that historically small companies have outperformed their large counterparts over decades6. Yet for the average investor, it’s difficult to not want to go all in on the large gains you’ve recently seen on familiar companies you likely interact with every day.

If outperforming were as easy as picking the recent winners and calling it a day, active fund managers would have a far better track record than they currently do. But as we’ll explore in a future blog, the record of both U.S. and Canadian active stock managers is poor, supporting the idea that it’s extremely difficult to outsmart the market and predict in advance who the winners of tomorrow will be.

Like the Apples or TDs of today, or the IBMs or Blackberrys of the past, a few large high-flying companies will often garner the headlines. Yet the key to reaching your financial goals is not the fool’s errand of trying to guess what the wonder company of tomorrow will be, but in keeping a well-diversified portfolio that will own all the companies that may provide that growth.

By Matthew Carvalho, Chief Investment Officer

1Just three stocks are responsible for most of the market’s gain this year, CNBC, Jul 10, 2018
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/07/10/amazon-netflix-and-microsoft-hold-most-of-the-markets-gain-in-2018.html

2S&P 500 Hits Tech-Heavy Milestone Last Seen With Dot-Com Bubble, Bloomberg, Feb 28, 2018
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-02-28/s-p-500-hits-tech-heavy-milestone-last-seen-amid-dot-com-bubble

3@michaelbatnick tweet, July 18, 2018
https://twitter.com/michaelbatnick/status/1019680856837849090/photo/1

4@tbfairchild tweet, Jun 6, 2018
https://twitter.com/tbfairchild/status/1004375185179529217

5@benjaminwfelix tweet, July 13, 2018
https://twitter.com/benjaminwfelix/status/1017869943226937345/photo/1

6 Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bond, Journal of Financial Economics 1993, Fama and French

Filed Under: Articles Tagged With: canada us cross border tax, Cross-Border Financial Advisor, cross-border wealth management

Articles You Might Like

fiduciary standard

Fiduciary Standard or a Pretender

CA US 401k/RRSP deductibility

Ebook: Canadian Deductibility of 401(K) Contributions and U.S. Deductibility of RRSP Contributions

Ramifications of Liquidating Brokerage Account

Residents of Canada: What are the Canadian and U.S. Tax Ramifications when being forced to liquidate a U.S. brokerage account Ebook

Discuss your goals with us today
Canada US Investment Management Goals
We can handle all of your Canada-U.S. investment management, tax, estate and financial planning complications
Wealth management strategies fit for you
Cross-Border Financial Management assessment
Our cross-border financial planning team can provide an assessment of your needs based on your unique circumstances

How We Help

  • Cross-Border Financial & Tax Planning
  • Americans Living in Canada
  • Canadians Living in the U.S.
  • Moving to Canada from the U.S.
  • Moving to the U.S. from Canada
  • Expatriates Living Abroad

What We Do

  • Investment Management
  • Wealth Planning
  • Tax Planning & Preparation
  • Private Wealth Services for U.S. Residents
  • Private Wealth Services for Canadian Residents
  • Cross-Border Financial & Tax Planning
  • Business Management for Athletes

Resources

  • Canadians in California
  • Canadians in Texas
  • Canadians in Florida
  • Canadians in Arizona
  • Canadian and U.S. Expat Tax Planning
  • Wealth Management for U.S. Citizens in Canada
  • Custodian Closed Your Cross-Border Investment Account?

Videos & Social Media

  • Americans in Canada: Investment Basics
  • Americans Selling Canadian Homes Face Tax Issues
  • Does it make financial sense to renounce your U.S. citizenship?
    BrightScope Cardinal Point Twitter Cardinal Point Google Plus Cardinal Point Facebook Cardinal Point LinkedIn Cardinal Point
Copyright © 2023 Cardinal Point Capital Management, ULC. All Rights Reserved.

“Cardinal Point” is the brand under which dedicated professionals within Cardinal Point Capital Management, ULC provide financial, tax and investment advisory, risk management, financial planning and tax services to selected clients. Cardinal Point Capital Management, ULC is a US registered investment advisor and a registered portfolio manager in Canada (ON, QC, MB, SK, NS, NB, AB, BC). Advisory services are only offered to clients or prospective clients where Cardinal Point and its representatives are properly registered or exempt from registration. This website is solely for informational purposes. Past performance is no guarantee of future returns. Investing involves risk and possible loss of principal capital.